Use Cases / Energy / Oil and Energy
Energy · Oil sands operations
An executive command centre for oil sands.
Every call you make runs on your data, but it lives in a dozen systems that rarely agree. See how Praxis turns them into one governed view.
Industry Energy
For Executives, Operations
Length 1:32
Oil sands operations
Every call you make runs on your data.
But it lives in a dozen systems that rarely agree.
By the time it reconciles, the moment has passed.
Weeks of stitching, before anyone can decide.
Start with one executive requirements document.
Boreal Sands Energy · December 2025 · Company-wide
What comes back: a governed executive command centre.
Plan attainment slipped. Where?
A mid-month constraint, concentrated on two pads.
Production vs plan · bbl per day · December
Dec 11–15 · down about 4,000 bbl a day
Variance to plan by pad · bbl
Needs executive attention
Three decisions that need you, not more reports.
Every exposure is bounded. Every decision has a named owner. The call stays with your people.
Every number traces back to its source.
PAD-03, pairs 17 and 18: revision 1 replaced by revision 2, +950 m³ bitumen
executive requirements document
source feeds
governed executive command centre
Delivered in weeks, not quarters.
Read the story as text
- Scattered data. Oil sands operations. Every call you make runs on your data, but it lives in a dozen systems that rarely agree: production volumes, steam injection, historian tags, production plan, operating events, work orders, month-end accounting, commercial pricing, asset register, water and fuel, well connections and field documents. By the time it reconciles, the moment has passed: weeks of stitching, before anyone can decide.
- One document. Start with one executive requirements document, “Executive command centre” for Boreal Sands Energy. Twelve source feeds connected.
- The command centre. What comes back for December 2025, company-wide: production 41.38K bbl a day (November 42.52K), plan attainment 94.9% (97.5%), steam-oil ratio 2.83 (2.71, lower is better), plant fuel intensity 1.32 GJ per bbl (1.25), contribution per barrel $37.97 CAD ($36.85) and evidence coverage 100.0%. Plan attainment slipped. Where?
- Where it slipped. A mid-month constraint, concentrated on two pads. From December 11 to 15 production fell by about 4,000 bbl a day against a plan of 43.6K. By pad, PAD-02 is 44K bbl below plan and PAD-04 34K below.
- Three decisions. Three decisions that need you, not more reports: review the production constraint on PAD-04 (up to $174K CAD, indicative, Reliability Engineering), confirm the emissions method (not estimated, Environmental Owner), approve Pad 06 operating pressure (not estimated, Engineering Approver). Every exposure is bounded. Every decision has a named owner. The call stays with your people.
- Every number traced. Contribution per barrel, $37.97 for December, traces back to production volumes, commercial pricing and month-end accounting. A month-end restatement was caught: PAD-03, pairs 17 and 18, revision 1 replaced by revision 2, +950 m³ bitumen.
- Weeks, not quarters. 1 executive requirements document, 12 source feeds, 1 governed executive command centre. Delivered in weeks, not quarters.
- Overstand Praxis. The business engineering system: from business intent to verified outcomes.
Space: play or pause · ← →: 5 seconds · M: sound
Next Use Case
Book a demo
See it on your own data.
Bring us one business problem. We will show you how Praxis handles it in your own environment, so you can judge the results before deciding to go further.