Use Cases / Energy / Renewables

Energy · Renewables

Renewables portfolio performance.

Every month, the same question: are we on plan, and if not, why? See how Praxis answers it for 33 solar, wind and storage sites.

Industry Energy

For Operations, Finance, Executives

Length 1:29

33 sites · solar, wind and storage

Every month, the same question.

20 solar8 wind5 storageacross US time zones, Hawaii included

Are we on plan, and if not, why?

One requirements document.

Eleven standard renewables data feeds.

Business requirementsPortfolio performance and operations

September 2026 · Portfolio against budget

Your operations command centre.

Fifteen connected views. Start anywhere.

Executive overviewPortfolio against planDaily operations triageSolar performanceWind performanceBattery storageCurtailment and revenueContracts and O&MFleet reliabilityData trustDaily summaryLoss attributionAvailabilityMonthly operating packageSelf-serve analysis
Generation, MWh326,544Budget 346,098
Against budget−5.65%
Metered revenue$22.47M
Operational availability98.22%
Event lost energy, MWh9,283
Data completeness99.95%
Solar and wind sites behind plan18 of 28
Largest shortfalls to budget, MWh
Windward Bluff Wind−6,813
Valley Gust Wind−6,100
Cedar Flats Solar−1,347
Dune Valley Solar−1,312
Oak Prairie Solar−1,043

The insight

Budget to metered, step by step.

BudgetResourceAvailabilityCurtailment and exclusionsPerformance and residualMeteringMetered generation
−19,553 MWh

MWh, September 2026. Axis starts at 320,000.

Decisions and accountability

The numbers point. People decide.

6 of 33 sites below contractual availability, September

SiteO&M providerActual %Target %Gap, pts
Delta StorageVoltline Storage Services95.0898.00−2.92
Maui Trade WindNorthgate Wind Services95.3896.70−1.32
Granite Hill SolarSummit Field Services98.3299.30−0.98
Kestrel Point SolarSummit Field Services97.7598.60−0.85
Aspen Ridge SolarSummit Field Services98.5799.10−0.53
Oak Prairie SolarSummit Field Services99.1299.30−0.18
Awaiting your review

46 events open to dispute

793 MWh · $36,219

They follow a force majeure event. Confirm each against the contract before relying on the shortfall.

Owner sign-off

Budget version, contract targets and loss mapping

Shown as named settings, confirmed by the business.

Trust

Every figure traces back to source.

Metered generation, September326,544MWh
Source: SCADA interval readings647,584,339current rows, matched exactly
  • Budget plus every effect equals metered generation0.000 MWh difference, all 422 site-months
  • A historical correction flowed throughWith its audit entry: old value, new value, when
  • September locked for reporting1,092 figures held; later changes shown as variance
1

requirements document

11

renewables data feeds

1

governed operations command centre

Delivered in weeks.

Read the story as text
  1. The question. 33 sites: 20 solar, 8 wind and 5 storage, across US time zones, Hawaii included. Every month, the same question: are we on plan, and if not, why?
  2. One document. One requirements document, “Portfolio performance and operations”, connected to eleven standard renewables data feeds: SCADA interval readings, equipment operating states, outage and curtailment events, loss categories, daily energy-loss analysis, signal catalogue, site register, site capacity and location, equipment register, equipment specifications, contract terms and targets.
  3. Command centre. Your operations command centre for September 2026, portfolio against budget. Fifteen connected views; start anywhere. Generation 326,544 MWh against a budget of 346,098 (−5.65%), metered revenue $22.47M, operational availability 98.22%, event lost energy 9,283 MWh, data completeness 99.95%. 18 of 28 solar and wind sites are behind plan; the largest shortfalls are Windward Bluff Wind (−6,813 MWh) and Valley Gust Wind (−6,100 MWh).
  4. The gap explained. Budget to metered, step by step: budget 346,098 MWh, resource +255, availability −3,379, curtailment and exclusions −4,818, performance and residual −5,801, metering −5,809, metered generation 326,544. A gap of −19,553 MWh.
  5. Who decides. The numbers point; people decide. 6 of 33 sites are below contractual availability, led by Delta Storage (95.08% against 98.00%). 46 events, 793 MWh and $36,219, are open to dispute and await review. Budget version, contract targets and loss mapping are confirmed by the business.
  6. Proven to source. Every figure traces back to source: 326,544 MWh comes from 647,584,339 SCADA rows, matched exactly. Budget plus every effect equals metered generation across all 422 site-months, a historical correction flowed through with its audit entry, and September is locked for reporting.
  7. The claim. 1 requirements document, 11 renewables data feeds, 1 governed operations command centre. Delivered in weeks.
  8. Overstand Praxis. The business engineering system: from business intent to verified outcomes.

Space: play or pause · ← →: 5 seconds · M: sound

Book a demo

See it on your own data.

Bring us one business problem. We will show you how Praxis handles it in your own environment, so you can judge the results before deciding to go further.